![]() That’s something that AI can do far better than humans. Therefore, Stem’s AI simply needs to direct energy resources to their most efficient usage. Mathematically speaking, the number of variables and the framework in which they operate are constant. With Stem, its AI is doing the equivalent of playing chess but with smart energy management. “It is an example of what is called nonrecurrent engineering,” Hayes-Roth explained. Our minds are hard to replicate, because we are “very, very complicated systems that are both evolved and adapted through learning to deal well and differentially with dozens of variables at one time.” Algorithms that can perform a specialized task, like playing chess, cannot be easily adapted for other purposes. John Horgan writing for Scientific American explained:ĪI had not lived up to expectations, acknowledged. And it’s not just my personal fanciful opinion. Lately, I’ve criticized AI because it appears investors expect way too much from the innovation. Nevertheless, the company has a clear advantage: its AI-based solution is a technology you can believe in. ![]() In particular, the broader green energy sector took a hit earlier this year as people questioned its utility and resilience in light of the disastrous Texas winter storm. I won’t deny that there are still risks involved with STEM stock. For instance, while popular former SPACs like Virgin Galactic (NYSE: SPCE) enjoyed a recent resurgence, the June 9 session reminded folks once again that reverse mergers do not necessarily lead to stable securities. Still, should investors risk placing a wager? While the move higher certainly brings a level of confidence, there’s also the chance that SPACs could once again disappoint. That’s not bad at all for a period extending less than a month. At time of writing, shares are at more than $33, which would give the equity unit an 102% gain. Hopefully, you were able to take advantage.īut since May 13, the narrative for STEM stock has changed dramatically. Still, from the time of publication (May 5) to May 13, STEM stock tanked 27%. And warrants impose a dilutive effect, making such reverse mergers a less-than-enticing proposition outside the hype. Instead, SPAC sponsors usually take the bulk of the equity. Part of the reason is that SPACs aren’t necessarily retail buyer friendly. But up until very recently, they lost much of their original fervor. 10 Best Stocks to Buy That Will Get You Through the DayĪs you know, SPACs became the toast of Wall Street over the trailing year.Second, Stem originally became a publicly traded asset via a reverse merger with a special purpose acquisition company or SPAC. For one thing, STEM stock incurred wild swings in either direction, making profit predictability difficult. My argument was that despite the underlying potential of the business, fear had taken hold of this trade. In my last go-around with the energy tech firm, I suggested as an idea that investors should allow shares to sink some more, then take advantage at a better price. Well, no one’s going to accuse me of clickbait with STEM stock. While I understand the reader’s anger, the reality is that article titles must have some juice to it. Personally, having worked this market for the last few years, it’s a 50/50 conundrum. ![]() ![]() One of the biggest criticisms that I see among the internet audience across all online media is clickbait titles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |